Re: (ASCEND) Re: K56 Rockwell Code 1.140 + Ap27

[Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>]

At 09:20 PM 10/23/97 -0400, Jason Nealis wrote:
>
>
>On Thu, 23 Oct 1997, Shiloh Costa wrote:
>
>> >N/A    Rockwell K56 1.140 code fixes abnormal disconnects on K56 modems.
>> >* Support for Rockwell K56 code version 1.140.
>> 
>> Does Ap27 (Max4000 tk.m40) have Rockwell K56 Code version 1.140?
>
> NO. Unless 1.140 is a code name for 1.055 see below, This was taken
>off a Max 4004 w/ AP27 loaded.

Version 1.140 is the Rockwell code level that was in the TNT release quoted by
Shiloh...I don't recall which now....it's in the archives ;)

> Connected to modem 8:8...
>ati3i6
>V1.055_NOTNT-K56_DLP_CSM

That MAX has 1.055 Rockwell code....

>RC56DPF L8565A Rev 34.0/34.0
>OK
>
>I'm guessing the 1.140 is the lucent naming convention, (or the real KFLEX
>naming convention for KFLEX code) 

No, it's the Rockwell code version - still K56Flex 1.1.

MAX version 5.0Ap33 has Rockwell code 1.140



Kevin


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

References:

• (ASCEND) Re: K56 Rockwell Code 1.140 + Ap27
• From: Shiloh Costa <costa@mdi.ca>
• Re: (ASCEND) Re: K56 Rockwell Code 1.140 + Ap27
• From: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>

---

• Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Q. Can you run servers behind Pipeline (running NAT)?
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) P130 SNMP Problem?
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Re: K56 Rockwell Code 1.140 + Ap27
• Next by thread: (ASCEND) Re: K56 Rockwell Code 1.140 + Ap27
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread