Re: (ASCEND) Q. Can you run servers behind Pipeline (running NAT)?

[Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>]

At 06:26 PM 11/12/97 -0500, Edwin Yeh wrote:
>
>I am still hopeing a solution is available. Maybe something like setting the
>default
>route to a specific machine. That is, if an unsolicted packet is sent to the
>pipeline 75,
>it will automatically (by default through some sort of configuration on p75)
>be routed to a specific machine. It should be doable, at least conceptually.

I'm still looking into the details here, since I think it is possible...maybe
a few limitations that I need to verify first. I'll post here when I get the
answers.....maybe I should read the docs and release notes ;)


Kevin


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

References:

• Re: (ASCEND) Q. Can you run servers behind Pipeline (running NAT)?
• From: "Edwin Yeh" <ery2@po.cwru.edu>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Silence on connect.
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Q. Can you run servers behind Pipeline (running NAT)?
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Q. Can you run servers behind Pipeline (running NAT)?
• Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Q. Can you run servers behind Pipeline (running NAT)?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread