Re: (ASCEND) Max 4048 & X2 Modems

To: jwsewell@altamaha.net, ascend-users@max.bungi.com
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Max 4048 & X2 Modems
From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 14:25:46 -0800
In-Reply-To: <346B0E6C.7583@altamaha.net>
References: <199711130053.QAA06481@max.bungi.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 09:27 AM 11/13/97 -0500, Jim Sewell wrote:
>We are running a Max 4048 (+5.0Ap24+) with channelized T-1.We have a
>few users with USR X2 modems that are experiencing problems connecting
>to the Max. They are reporting a good connectiong but after 2-3 minutes
>the throughput slows to a crawl or either diconnects within 1-2 minutes.
>We have a few analog (microcom) modems on standard circuits and they
>get stable 33.6K connections on these modems. 
>
>We have had them try using AT&FS32=34 in the init string to disable
>the X2 and utilize the ,,,, after the dial string. Neither seems to
>provide any better results.
>
>Any suggestons?

Have them also disable V.42bis compression.....


Kevin


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

(ASCEND) Max 4048 & X2 Modems

From: Jim Sewell <jwsewell@altamaha.net>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Re: MPP on Pipeline 50
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Q. Can you run servers behind Pipeline (running NAT)?
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Max 4048 & X2 Modems
Next by thread: (ASCEND) Followup on P75 Caller ID Time & Date Stamp
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread