Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap33 woes ....

To: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap33 woes ....
From: Stephen Fisher <lithium@cia-g.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 18:36:57 -0700 (MST)
cc: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>, Greg Skafte <skafte@worldgate.com>, ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.971121170936.15462C-100000@babylon.erols.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com


On Fri, 21 Nov 1997, Jason Nealis wrote:

> On Fri, 21 Nov 1997, Kevin Smith wrote:

> > There is *NO* regression testing until the formal release - like 6.0 - that's
> > been made clear numerous times, and is stated in the FTP site README files.
> 
>  Wait, I think saying there is no regression testing , That can not
> be correct, Apparently, I was under the impression that when a Patch
> Release is cut, They spend a couple days checking simple items like
> routing, auth, acct, etc.. 

You would think so, huh?  I can't believe Ascend doesn't even do much
testing on publically available patch releases.

 - Steve
  - Systems Manager
  - Community Internet Access, Inc.
  - Gallup and Grants, New Mexico


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap33 woes ....

From: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap34
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Does the max4004 have this
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap33 woes ....
Next by thread: (ASCEND) Testing Performance of Ascend P-130 vs Cisco 2503
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread