Re: (ASCEND) Link-Comp-MS-Stac stops working (fwd)

[Jim Howard <jhoward@lyceum.com>]

At 01:42 1997/11/23 -0800, MegaZone wrote:
>Once upon a time Phillip Vandry shaped the electrons to say...
>>Dodn't the 0x80,0x81,0x82 and 0x83 DNS and WINS IPCP options start out as
>>proprietary, only to be published later as an RFC?

>Basically just telling everyone how their proprietary system works.  It
>was rejected by the PPP WG, but they did it anyway.

If I remeber correctly, it was rejected because MS
tried to do it the wrong way, 
they were putting these in the LCP instead of the IPCP...

its not a bad idea, just poorly implemented.

The only compression I've seen that actually
works well with Windows/WinNT is "none"

-Jim H
----
Jim Howard             Sr Network Engineer        Lyceum Internet
jhoward@lyceum.com     http://www.lyceum.com/     404.248.1733     

My PGP Public Key: http://www.lyceum.com/~jhoward/pgp-key.txt
Fingerprint: 7E8B E2BA 1314 2535 CB08  CFF9 119B 7CD3 2488 954D

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) P. 75, NAT, Dynamic, ISP Argumentative, Question
• Next by Date: RE: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap34
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Link-Comp-MS-Stac stops working (fwd)
• Next by thread: (ASCEND) RADIUS script - please test
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread