RE: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ?

To: Adam Neat <adamneat@ipax.com.au>
Subject: RE: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ?
From: Joe Shaw <jshaw@insync.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 09:59:05 -0600 (CST)
cc: Dave Van Allen <dave@fast.net>, ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <199711250818.TAA15435@kryten.ipax.com.au>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

Look into the Cisco 7200.  It's cheap, powerful, and it's the best way to
do BGP to date.  The MAXen are RAS (Remote Access Server) equipment, and
BGP is best handled by edge/core routers like the Cisco line and the GRF
400 or 1600 (I've use both and prefer the Cisco though some swear by the
GRF).

Joe Shaw - jshaw@insync.net
NetAdmin - Insync Internet Services
Learn more, and you will never starve.

On Wed, 26 Nov 1997, Adam Neat wrote:

> Hi Alan 
> 
> Firstly, I wouldnt use NT RAS in a mission critical environment if i 
> was made to! :)
> 
> We have several links - we want to intelligently route data over 
> these links. Is there a better way (anyone) that can be used?
> 
> here in Australia, BGP is really the only multi-homed system 
> available. 
> 
> Any suggestions with Ascend gear?
> 
> adam

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

RE: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ?

From: "Adam Neat" <adamneat@ipax.com.au>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ?
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) 56K and Serial # 645000 ???
Next by thread: (ASCEND) What the big ones do
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread