Re: (ASCEND) Max 220?

To: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Max 220?
From: Joe Shaw <jshaw@insync.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 1997 11:08:22 -0600 (CST)
cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.971126120038.27380C-100000@babylon.erols.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

On Wed, 26 Nov 1997, Jason Nealis wrote:

> 
>  Why, I don't have any experience with the MAX200+ what type 
> of issues did you have with the box?
> 
> Jason

Basicly, it's the box that has the 8 Type II PCMCIA or 4 Type III PCMCIA
slots for modems (type II) or ISDN (type III) pcmcia cards.  It works fine
with 1, 2 and 3 channels.  As soon as it brings up a forth or not shortly
after, it just dies.  No telnet, nothing.  We sent 5 of them back for one
customer in a 4 month period, and they finally went with 2 pipe 50s (one
for connectivity to us, one for the boss to dial in with).  I talked with
them recently and they couldn't believe how much better it was.

Joe Shaw - jshaw@insync.net
NetAdmin - Insync Internet Services

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) Max 220?

From: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ?
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) GRF: up to it?
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Max 220?
Next by thread: (ASCEND) FAT Codes Through SNMP?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread