Re: (ASCEND) Pipeline 220

To: Gordon Mackenzie <gmackenz@ascend.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Pipeline 220
From: Joe Shaw <jshaw@insync.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 1997 16:33:20 -0600 (CST)
cc: ascend-users <ascend-users@max.bungi.com>
In-Reply-To: <347CB88B.62BD2FE9@ascend.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

I think we know the difference between the Max200+ and the Pipe220.  The
thing is, they are in identical cases.  With the track record of The
Max200+, anything that shows up in my office that looks like it
immediately brings on "bad feelings(tm)."


Joe Shaw - jshaw@insync.net
NetAdmin - Insync Internet Services

On Wed, 26 Nov 1997, Gordon Mackenzie wrote:

> Pipeline 220 is not a MAX 200, there are at present no MAX 220s.
> 
> See:
> 
> http://www.ascend.com/2237.html
> 
> for more details
> -- 
> $$$/\$$$   Gordon Mackenzie 
> $$/  \$$   Test Department, Ascend Communications, Inc.    
> $/ () \$   gmackenz@ascend.com
> /      \   (510) 747-2790
> 
>            "Ave, Ascend, probaturi te salutamus"
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> 

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

(ASCEND) Pipeline 220

From: Gordon Mackenzie <gmackenz@ascend.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36
Next by Date: (ASCEND) To any Dutch P75 users
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Pipeline 220
Next by thread: (ASCEND) Excellent Report of 56k
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread