{...} our ISDN guy here, showed me a very interesting article
comparing the Cisco AS5300 and the MAX TNT. LANQuest sent
through lots of 64/256-byte packets across 92 simultaneous
analog or digital connections, and the TNT had *very serious*
throughput problems. The results were quite surprising and I
wondered if the test was really valid.
Look at <A HREF="http://www.lanquest.com/reports/remote_access_servers/cisco30.htm">http://www.lanquest.com/reports/remote_access_servers/cisco30.htm</A>
--
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <<A HREF="http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq">http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq</A>>
</PRE>
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<HR>
<UL>
<LI>Prev by Date:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg10440.html">(ASCEND) Re: ascend-users-digest V96 #875</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Next by Date:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg10439.html">(ASCEND) Ascend stock</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Prev by thread:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg10438.html">(ASCEND) Global IP with AAC</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Next by thread:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg10440.html">(ASCEND) Re: ascend-users-digest V96 #875</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Index(es):
<UL>
<LI><A HREF="maillist.html#10443"><STRONG>Main</STRONG></A></LI>
<LI><A HREF="thrd230.html#10443"><STRONG>Thread</STRONG></A></LI>
</UL>
</LI>
</UL>
<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
</BODY>
</HTML>