uhh... we had an as5200, and neither reseller or local Cisco could make it work, even with IP-only, static routes.. it had horrible performance and stability problems with 60 modems. > Incidentally, Cisco has a web page that lists every test they perform for > every software release, major or minor, that's very informative. Maybe the > Ascend quality control people should look at it. That's the main difference.. Sad to say, but I don't think there is much to be proud of in Cisco sw quality. Also Cisco has myriads of bugs and problems, but it's much easier to get the necessary information, and IF you can send them enough debug data they even compile a special version for you.. the ascend bug reporting system is a black hole, the last blink before total darkness is the tracking number. VesA ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: <<A HREF="http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq">http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq</A>> </PRE> <!--X-MsgBody-End--> <!--X-Follow-Ups--> <!--X-Follow-Ups-End--> <!--X-References--> <HR> <STRONG>References</STRONG>: <UL> <LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg11004.html">(ASCEND) Maturity or Second Childhood</A></STRONG></LI> <UL> <LI><EM>From</EM>: "T. D. Wolf" <direwolf@ritalin.shout.net></LI> </UL> </UL> <!--X-References-End--> <!--X-BotPNI--> <HR> <UL> <LI>Prev by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg11035.html">Re: (ASCEND) fatal error index 2</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg11032.html">Re: (ASCEND) fatal error index 2</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Prev by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg11004.html">(ASCEND) Maturity or Second Childhood</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg10973.html">(ASCEND) Pipeline 50 Processor & Mem. stats</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Index(es): <UL> <LI><A HREF="maillist.html#11034"><STRONG>Main</STRONG></A></LI> <LI><A HREF="thrd251.html#11034"><STRONG>Thread</STRONG></A></LI> </UL> </LI> </UL> <!--X-BotPNI-End--> <!--X-User-Footer--> <!--X-User-Footer-End--> </BODY> </HTML>