Re: (ASCEND) reorder (fast busies)

[Bob K <melange@yip.org>]

On Mon, 13 Jul 1998, Troy Settle wrote:

[snip of something I can't offer insight on]
> We also seem to generate fast busies when we queisce a trunk.  I've asked
> for one of the guys at the CO to look at the pipe, but all they ever see,
> are idle channels.  Anyone have an idea on why the telco switch isn't
> seeing me queisce a pipe?  (how about why the telco doesn't understand the
> word queisce? what do they call it?)

We occasionally run into the same problem, usually when the telco has
improperly configured the overflow of the PRI's.  As for quiescing, you
might want to try referring to it as "administratively out-of-service"...

melange@yip.org - "Slightly tacky but completely entertaining"

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

Follow-Ups:

• Re: (ASCEND) reorder (fast busies)
• From: Alex P <alex@stomp.gomax.com>

References:

• (ASCEND) reorder (fast busies)
• From: Troy Settle <rewt@i-Plus.net>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) ppp/mp/mpp connection coronaries continued
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Overloading of MAX ethernet ports?
• Prev by thread: (ASCEND) reorder (fast busies)
• Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) reorder (fast busies)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread