Re: (ASCEND) Is LQM any good ?

To: "Andre Beck" <beck@ibh.de>, "Ascend Users" <ascend-users@bungi.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Is LQM any good ?
From: "Marc Williams" <marcw@demon.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 10:37:17 +0100
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com


>Would this be possible with P130s ? How to configure them ? How to provide
>for working keepalive that detects simplex failures ?


>From my understanding the Link Maintenance packets dont work, neither does
LQM in the code for the MAX4000 and Pipelines. It is claimed to be fixed in
the code release for the TNT's.

--
Marc





++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Mac Users
Next by Date: (ASCEND) Is LQM any good ?
Prev by thread: (ASCEND) Is LQM any good ?
Next by thread: (ASCEND) Calling-Station-Id Wildcards?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread