Re: (ASCEND) POTS bonding

To: "Kevin A. Smith" <kevin@ascend.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) POTS bonding
From: Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET>
Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 14:33:20 -0400 (EDT)
cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 07 May 1998 11:23:10 EDT." <3.0.5.32.19980507112310.00c81b70@spanky.ascend.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

> The MAX will most likely be on the "answering" side of any "weird" combination
> of link types. In the incoming direction, obviously the remote client drives
> where the packets go, and if they are fragmented or not - the MAX will handle
> either way. On the outgoing side, the MAX will send to the next 'free'
> channel.
> The MAX does not send fragmented, but whole frames independent of the link
> speed. If one frame is being sent over a slow speed link and then two other
> frames are destined for the same endpoint, it could well send them both
> over the faster link - depending on if the first frame was completed or
> not....does that make sense?

Sure it makes sense! Thanks.

-Phil
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) POTS bonding

From: "Kevin A. Smith" <kevin@ascend.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) How to run multiple RADIUS Servers on one system?
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Windows95 p/w prompt?
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) POTS bonding
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) POTS bonding
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread