Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) MAX 6000
I'm still waiting on my demo unit, but it will replace one of our
production units so we can see how well it performs. I would think that
if everything I've heard about it were true, then I am going to love this
box. Now if Ascend can just get the kinks worked out of their 6.0.x
versions of software, I'll be a happy man.
I've dug around and talked to some local providers who use maxen and only
the ones doing both OSPF and stacking seem to be having problems with
6.0.x. We downgraded all of our problematic maxen to 5.0ap51 and haven't
had any problem since. With 6.0.x doing both OSPF and Stacking, our tech
support was totally overwhelmed with complaints of unexplained
disconnects.
Regards,
Joe Shaw - jshaw@insync.net
NetAdmin - Insync Internet Services
Fortune: 43rd Law of Computing: Anything that can go wr
fortune: Segmentation violation -- Core dumped
On Fri, 8 May 1998, Robert Fournerat wrote:
> Is anybody using the MAX 6000 yet? If so, what do
> you think of it?
>
> thanks,
> Robert
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
References: