Re: (ASCEND) NAT kills throughput?

To: "Kevin A. Smith" <kevin@ascend.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) NAT kills throughput?
From: Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET>
Date: Sun, 17 May 1998 13:07:17 -0400 (EDT)
cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 16 May 1998 16:46:32 EDT." <3.0.5.32.19980516164632.00b37dd0@spanky.ascend.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

> At 04:10 PM 5/15/98 -0400, Phillip Vandry wrote:
> >Has anyone else experienced the following problem?
> >
> >P50's or P75's running 6.0.2 and Single IP NAT.
> >
> >Workstations behind the Pipeline cannot pull more than 4K/s through
> >the Pipeline instead of the 8K/s you'd expect out of one channel or
> >16K/s out of 2 channels. This problem is consistent.
> 
> Another test 28.6 KB/Sec - RFC file:
> 
> http://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc1142.ps

I just took one of the NAT configs which exhibits this problem, removed
NAT, and I still can't get more than 4K/second. There must be something
different and bad about this config... I'm trying to find it!

-Phil
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) NAT kills throughput?

From: "Kevin A. Smith" <kevin@ascend.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) GRF and filterd.conf
Next by Date: (ASCEND) capacity planning
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) NAT kills throughput?
Next by thread: (ASCEND) 6.0.7 for DSLpipe
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread