Re: (ASCEND) Ascend RADIUS - what now?

["Jason Nealis" <nealis@rcn.com>]

More bong hits :) haha, j/k,

Ascend has always stated they are always standard compliant, I'm sure they
will move up their bogus attributes, In my mind they don't have a choice if
they want to continually make the statement about standard compliant.


IMO, The right thing is to stay compliant with the IETF spec's.

Jason Nealis
Director of Internet Operations
RCN
-----Original Message-----
From: MegaZone <megazone@megazone.org>
To: Ascend Users <ascend-users@bungi.com>
Date: Thursday, March 04, 1999 8:15 PM
Subject: (ASCEND) Ascend RADIUS - what now?


>I'm just curious...
>
>The IETF RADIUS WG RFCs and drafts have reached Attribute 86 -
>(Acct-Tunnel-Packets-Lost).
>
>The next number to be assigned is 87 - and Ascend has bogus attributes
>taking almost every number from 87-255.
>
>So, Ascend's private bogus playground is going to get paved over with
>official attributes before too long.  How does Ascend plan on dealing
>with this?
>
>-MZ
>--
>-=*X GOT CLUE? ISPF II - SAN DIEGO, CA 3/6-10 <URL:http://www.ispf.com/>
X*=-
><URL:mailto:megazone@megazone.org> Gweep, Discordian, Author, Engineer,
me..
>Join ISP/C Internet Service Providers' Consortium
<URL:http://www.ispc.org/>
>"A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men"
781-788-0130
><URL:http://www.megazone.org/>  <URL:http://www.gweep.net/>  Hail
Discordia!
>++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
>To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
>To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>