Re: (ASCEND) Max 4048 & email attachments

To: "Jerry O'Brien" <jobrien@cuttingedge.net>, <ascend-users@bungi.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Max 4048 & email attachments
From: "John Coy (anc.net)" <jcoy@anc.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 18:52:23 -0600
In-Reply-To: <000201be7548$26c6a400$460743cf@bear>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

Are your reverse name maps configured properly in your DNS server?  
A lot of performance and e-mail problems can be caused by improper
reverse name lookups.


At 09:48 AM 3/23/99 -0600, Jerry O'Brien wrote:
>Anybody know of anything in the Max 4048 (6.1.7) that would prevent certain
>users from sending attachments to email? I have only one box doing this, so
>it doesn't look like a mail server problem. If they embed the same content
>instead of attaching it, it works fine.
>
>Jerry O'Brien
>
>
>++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
>To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
>To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:
- (ASCEND) Max 4048 & email attachments
  - From: "Jerry O'Brien" <jobrien@cuttingedge.net>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Lots of routing entrys in a Pipeline
Next by Date: (ASCEND) Max, Radius, Termserv, PPP No go.
Prev by thread: (ASCEND) Max 4048 & email attachments
Next by thread: (ASCEND) WTB 4048 empty chassis
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread