Re: (ASCEND) IPv6 question ?

To: Jake Messinger <jake@ams.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) IPv6 question ?
From: Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET>
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 14:46:44 -0400 (EDT)
cc: Hangu Jeong <netcops@channeli.net>, ascend-users@bungi.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 28 May 1999 13:10:22 EDT." <Pine.LNX.4.10.9905281309450.3694-100000@linux.ams.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

> On Fri, 28 May 1999, Phillip Vandry wrote:
> 
> :My belief is that it's simply too costly to deploy IPv6. As the Internet
> :continues to become a more mission critical network for more and more
> 
> Nat or IPV6. its 6 to 1/2 dozen of the other. They will both require
> upgrades on the access equipment.

IPv6 requires an overhaul of the whole Internet before advantages can be
drawn from it. NAT does not.

-Phil
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: (ASCEND) IPv6 question ?
  - From: Jake Messinger <jake@ams.com>

References:
- Re: (ASCEND) IPv6 question ?
  - From: Jake Messinger <jake@ams.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Frequent Disconnects
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Frequent Disconnects
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) IPv6 question ?
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) IPv6 question ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread