Crossfire Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Getting Xpm to work on a NeXT
- To: crossfire@ifi.uio.no
 
- Subject: Re: Getting Xpm to work on a NeXT
 
- From: Petri Heinil{ <Petri.Heinila@lut.fi>
 
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 1994 16:07:07 +0300 (EETDST)
 
- In-Reply-To: <199403312309.AA28310@bolero.rahul.net>
 
On Thu, 31 Mar 1994, Mark Wedel wrote:
>  I've noticed that on some systems, it seems that duuring compile,
> it is using -DXpm_pix instead of -DXpm_Pix  The later is what must
> be used.  I don't know why in some cases the first one is being
> used.
Here raises the question of naming conventions in my mind.
Frank used the convention
	function_to_object, and macros in BIG
and I used the style in crossedit
	ObjectFunction, macros in same way
and there now seems to exists
	Function_Object or Object_Function, macros in same way
I do not say whict way is best, but I say it would be good
for development ahead, that there are common logical way
to name objects and functions.
-- <A HREF="http://www.lut.fi/~hevi/">The Page</A> --