Re: [TCLUG:11279] Hit The Routes!!!

["Brian Ackermann" <brianj@subrad.com>]

Ok, even stranger, if I deactivate all the interfacese, and reactivate them in
numeric order, I get this (I've removed the static-routes file, but they still
get loaded somehow...where do I delete them from if not from static-routes?) for
my route table...


Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
205.218.57.25   *               255.255.255.255 UH    0      0        0 eth0
205.218.57.18   *               255.255.255.255 UH    0      0        0 eth1
192.168.6.2     *               255.255.255.255 UH    0      0        0 eth2
205.218.57.16   *               255.255.255.240 U     0      0        0 eth0
205.218.57.16   *               255.255.255.240 U     0      0        0 eth1
192.168.6.0     *               255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth2
127.0.0.0       *               255.0.0.0       U     0      0        0 lo
default         gw.bbros.com    0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth0

Which I think is ALMOST what I want to have.  Only thing that needs to be
changed is the multiple routes to the 205.218.57.16 network

Brian...


----------
>From: "Brian Ackermann" <brianj@subrad.com>
>To: tclug <tclug-list@mn-linux.org>
>Subject: [TCLUG:11279] Hit The Routes!!!
>Date: Sat, Dec 18, 1999, 10:50 AM
>

> Ok, folks, I'm back to my usual Saturday passtime...Getting this firewall up
and
> running...I've got three 3C905 100baseT cards installed.  Eth0 is the outbound
> interface, eth1 goes to the 205.218.57.x subnet, and eth2 goes to the
> 192.168.6.x subnet.  So far so good...until I looked at the route table...
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
> 205.218.57.25   *               255.255.255.255 UH    0      0        0 eth0
> 205.218.57.18   *               255.255.255.255 UH    0      0        0 eth1
> 192.168.6.2     *               255.255.255.255 UH    0      0        0 eth2
> 205.218.57.16   205.218.57.25   255.255.255.240 UG    0      0        0 eth0
> 205.218.57.16   *               255.255.255.240 U     0      0        0 eth0
> 205.218.57.16   *               255.255.255.240 U     0      0        0 eth1
> 192.168.6.0     192.168.6.2     255.255.255.0   UG    0      0        0 eth2
> 192.168.6.0     *               255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth2
> 127.0.0.0       *               255.0.0.0       U     0      0        0 lo
> default         gw.bbros.com    0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth0
>
> As you can see, I've still go a bit of crazyness going on here....The first
> three lines lay out the IP's correctly, so we should notice that 205.218.57.18
> is the ip of the interface eth1, but, we look at the fourth line, and thats
not
> the case at all.  Instead, eth0 seems to think IT should be the gateway device
> for the 205 subnet...
>
> Below is the contents of /etc/sysconfig/static-routes on my RedHat 6.0 system,
> and that looks good to me, so I'm not sure where the problem is.
>
> eth2 net 192.168.6.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.6.2
> eth1 net 205.218.57.16 netmask 255.255.255.240 gw 205.218.57.18
>
> Again, as always, your help would be so appreciated.  I've learned so much
from
> this list, and from my own study.  I thank you all.
>
> Brian
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe@mn-linux.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help@mn-linux.org
>
>