TCLUG Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TCLUG:9401] Cisco 675 questions



I'm sure you can forward 'web' and 'telnet' from cisco

675 to internal IP. It is in the manual that came with
cisco 675.
Don't know about FTP.

-Mandar

chewe@tcfreenet.org> wrote:
> Now the question is, what if one wants to setup some
> servers, like web and
> ftp?  Since hte cisco is getting the real IP address
> and all machines have
> non reoutable IP's, how can anyone connect to the
> server?
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Andrew Dubman <adubman@bellmicro.com>
> To: <tclug-list@mn-linux.org>
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 1999 12:30 PM
> Subject: RE: [TCLUG:9401] Cisco 675 questions
> 
> 
> > I have just that setup.  If you connect directely
> to the 675, use the
> cross
> > cable (it's yellow).
> >
> > If you go thru a hub or switch, use normal
> ethernet cable.
> > As the 675 does DHCP and NAT, it doesn't care how
> many computers are on
> it.
> >
> > AS Jeremy Smith said, DHCP does NAT so there's no
> need for anything else
> to
> > do IP masquerading.
> >
> > I have a Window$ machine, a Sparc 20 running RH6
> and a PC running RH6 all
> on
> > at the same time, It works real schweet.
> >
> > Andy
> > adubman@bellmicro.com
> > adubman@uswest.net
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: psp@printwareinc.com
> [mailto:psp@printwareinc.com]
> > Sent: Monday, October 25, 1999 11:51 AM
> > To: tclug-list@mn-linux.org
> > Subject: [TCLUG:9401] Cisco 675 questions
> >
> >
> > When I installed my Cisco 675 router during
> installation of my USWest ADSL
> > line, it was clear that it was configured as a
> DHCP server. My sole client
> > computer was configured as a DHCP client, and wwas
> assigned 10.0.0.1 at
> > boot. Hmmm, why not get a hub, connect more
> clients and have them all
> share
> > the connection?
> >
> > USWest says that I can connect multiple clients,
> but they won't help out
> on
> > any internal network problems I may encounter.
> (The tech I talked with
> said
> > I needed a crossover cable going from the Cisco to
> my hub, then changed
> his
> > mind...which is it?)
> >
> > In this situtation, why do I need a separate box
> for IP Masquerading? I
> know
> > lots of you have worked hard to set up IP Masq
> boxes on your ADSL lines,
> so
> > I assume are other benefits than simply sharing
> the connection. Is the
> > USWest Cisco configuration "standard" throughout
> USWest, or could it be
> that
> > say, St. Paul uses one setup, Mpls another, etc.
> >
> > Phil Plumbo
> > St. Paul
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> tclug-list-unsubscribe@mn-linux.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> tclug-list-help@mn-linux.org
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> tclug-list-unsubscribe@mn-linux.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> tclug-list-help@mn-linux.org
> >
> 
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> tclug-list-unsubscribe@mn-linux.org
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> tclug-list-help@mn-linux.org
> 
> 


=====

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com