Re: [TCLUG:20803] Fast and scalable JDK?

["Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>]

That is what made me ask the question.  The IBM JVM (1.3.0) was very fast,
but it didn't seem to scale - and it died without any error messages.  The
Blackdown JVM (1.2.2) was much slower (relatively), but it scaled well.  I
am curious about the scalability of the IBM JVM.  It seems to me that IBM
wouldn't release a non-scalable Linux or Java product of any kind - so I was
curious about secondary real world opinions.

Tom Veldhouse
veldy@veldy.net

----- Original Message -----
From: Jeff Hallgren <jhallgren@abaton.com>
To: <tclug-list@mn-linux.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [TCLUG:20803] Fast and scalable JDK?


> There is also a recent set of benchmarks at
> http://www.volano.com/report.html
>
> "Gabe Turner (officer)" wrote:
> >
> > I've used IBM's JDK and it's super fast!  Also, search Slashdot.
Someone
> > just did a comparison of the major JDKs and it was posted to /. last
week.
> >
> > Gabe
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 10:30:00AM -0500, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> > > Can anybody recommend a fast and scalable JDK for Linux?  In that
order, but
> > > both properties are important.
> > >
> > > I have been looking at the following options (but am open to other
free JDK
> > > suggestions).
> > >
> > > Blackdown JDK 1.2.2 FCS (Inprise JIT ?)
> > >   and
> > > IBM JDK 1.3.0 (IBM JIT built in)
> > >
> > > Tom Veldhouse
> > > veldy@veldy.net
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe@mn-linux.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help@mn-linux.org
>
>