Re: [TCLUG:12874] VPN (was Re: [TCLUG:12807] bad day (more details))

To: tclug-list@mn-linux.org
Subject: Re: [TCLUG:12874] VPN (was Re: [TCLUG:12807] bad day (more details))
From: Chris McKinley <lamfada@lugh.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 10:01:15 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10001250953260.15980-100000@destiny.ringworld.org>

On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Scott Dier - dieman wrote:

> On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, ^chewie wrote:
> 
> > implementation of IPSEC and IKE)[2], and VPN with Vtun (involves an
> > additional Kernel module, but much nicer than Ssh and Pppd)[3].
> 
> Vtun is a very nice, but linux only solution.

not since 12/25, when the Solaris kernel module was written.

-Chris

References:
- Re: [TCLUG:12874] VPN (was Re: [TCLUG:12807] bad day (more details))
  - From: Scott Dier - dieman <dieman@ringworld.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [TCLUG:12874] VPN (was Re: [TCLUG:12807] bad day (more details))
Next by Date: Re: [TCLUG:12831] Issues raised today
Prev by thread: Re: [TCLUG:12874] VPN (was Re: [TCLUG:12807] bad day (more details))
Next by thread: Re: [TCLUG:12874] VPN (was Re: [TCLUG:12807] bad day (more details))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread