Re: [TCLUG:12912] SCSI advice

[Ben Kochie <ben@nerp.net>]

I have used them.. I'm not just branding the drive bad.  they didn't
impress me as being signifigantly different than the cheaper seagate
scsi drives.  I personaly prefer IBM ultrastar drives over just about
anything out there.  

Thank You,
        Ben Kochie (ben@nerp.net)

*-----------------------*  [ - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - ]
| Unix/Linux Consulting |  [ Haiku Error Message:          ]
|  PC/Mac Repair        |  [  Chaos reigns within.         ]
|   Networking          |  [  Reflect, repent, and reboot. ]
| http://nerp.net       |  [  Order shall return.          ]
*-----------------------*  [ - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - ]

 "Unix is user friendly, Its just picky about its friends."

On Fri, 28 Jan 2000, Nate Carlson wrote:

> On Fri, 28 Jan 2000 Nick.T.Reinking@supervalu.com wrote:
> 
> > I agree with Ben - I find that the IBM hard drives are
> > extremely reliable, and WD and Quantum drives
> > slightly less so.
> > 
> > Nick Reinking
> > 
> 
> Have you used WD Enterprise drives before? They are in a whole different
> league than their POS IDE drives. I haven't seen a single dead Enterprise,
> except for some drives that they had used for lab verification purposes
> and one of my friends picked up cheap (of course, WD still honored their
> warranty on those.. *grin*)
> 
> -- 
> Nate Carlson <carlson@real-time.com>    | Phone : (612)943-8700
> http://www.real-time.com                | Fax   : (612)943-8500
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe@mn-linux.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help@mn-linux.org
>