Re: [TCLUG:19553] Is it possible ?

To: tclug-list@mn-linux.org
Subject: Re: [TCLUG:19553] Is it possible ?
From: Jon Schewe <jpschewe@eggplant.mtu.net>
Date: 11 Jul 2000 16:26:08 -0500
In-Reply-To: Scott Dier's message of "Tue, 11 Jul 2000 16:16:03 -0500"
References: <20000711193759.26996.qmail@aw161.netaddress.usa.net> <20000711145449.B15834@ringworld.org> <m3d7kk4czt.fsf@eggplant.mn.mtu.net> <20000711161603.D15834@ringworld.org>
Reply-To: jpschewe@eggplant.mtu.net
Sender: jpschewe@eggplant.mtu.net
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) XEmacs/21.1 (Capitol Reef)

Scott Dier <dieman@ringworld.org> writes:

> * Jon Schewe <jpschewe@eggplant.mtu.net> [000711 15:36]:
> > So even if someone is hosting a domain off of a dialup you won't accept mail
> > from them?  Seems rather exterme to me, especially since I have done just that
> > in the past.
> 
> The idea being, no dynamic dialup user has the right to send mail
> directly to this host.  Therefore, it cuts down on the amount of crap
> spam that we get.

Ahh, dynamic dialup user.  That's the key.  When I was using dialup to host my
domain I had a static IP.

-- 
Jon Schewe 
http://eggplant.mtu.net/~jpschewe
jpschewe@eggplant.mtu.net

References:
- Is it possible ?
  - From: Yogesh Sharma <sharmay@usa.net>
- Re: [TCLUG:19553] Is it possible ?
  - From: Scott Dier <dieman@ringworld.org>
- Re: [TCLUG:19553] Is it possible ?
  - From: Jon Schewe <jpschewe@eggplant.mtu.net>
- Re: [TCLUG:19553] Is it possible ?
  - From: Scott Dier <dieman@ringworld.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [TCLUG:19547] [OT] royalty-free images
Next by Date: Re: [TCLUG:19507] Cannot get webalizer-2.00.12-2 to run.
Prev by thread: Re: [TCLUG:19553] Is it possible ?
Next by thread: Re: [TCLUG:19553] Is it possible ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread