Re: [TCLUG:19589] Is CUPS the real deal?

Subject: Re: [TCLUG:19589] Is CUPS the real deal?
From: Scott Dier <dieman@ringworld.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 08:23:00 -0500
Cc: TCLUG <tclug-list@mn-linux.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0007130813550.19189-100000@chef.nerp.net>; from ben@nerp.net on Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 08:17:41AM -0500
References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10007122318170.25922-100000@isis.visi.com> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0007130813550.19189-100000@chef.nerp.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i

* Ben Kochie <ben@nerp.net> [000713 08:18]:
> to debian.. and it works perfectly with LPRng AND lpr.  <rumor> redhat
> will be using lprng in the future </rumor>  

Coulda swore theres a rpm allready.  (/me looks at bentlema if hes
watching)

-- 
Scott Dier <dieman@ringworld.org> #nicnac@efnet 
http://www.ringworld.org/  finger:dieman@destiny.ringworld.org

Wait. Watch. Wonder.
	-J

http://sluggy.com/d/971226.html

PGP signature

References:
- Is CUPS the real deal?
  - From: Timothy Wilson <wilson@visi.com>
- Re: [TCLUG:19589] Is CUPS the real deal?
  - From: Ben Kochie <ben@nerp.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [TCLUG:19589] Is CUPS the real deal?
Next by Date: Re: [TCLUG:19566] Next TCLUG Installfest
Prev by thread: Re: [TCLUG:19589] Is CUPS the real deal?
Next by thread: TrueType/Type1 editor
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread