Re: [TCLUG:21791] RH v.s. Debian: A bit of oil on the waters, perhaps?

To: tclug-list@mn-linux.org
Subject: Re: [TCLUG:21791] RH v.s. Debian: A bit of oil on the waters, perhaps?
From: Ben Lutgens <blutgens@usinternet.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 23:30:50 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20000928111731.A23309@wookimus.net>; from chewie@wookimus.net on Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 11:17:31AM -0500
Mail-Followup-To: Ben Lutgens <ben@sistina.com>, tclug-list@mn-linux.org
References: <20000928111731.A23309@wookimus.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 11:17:31AM -0500, ^chewie wrote:
>
>I'm not trying to change any personal philosophies here; just trying
>to pour a little oil on our apparently troubled waters.
>
Good point, and well met.

Have I mentioned that emacs sucks lately? :-)

-- 
Ben Lutgens  Cell: 651.387.9065  Home: 651.703.9541


Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (T)hrowup
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- HUMOR: Emacs ...ahem...sucks ;-)
  - From: ^chewie <chewie@wookimus.net>

References:
- RH v.s. Debian: A bit of oil on the waters, perhaps?
  - From: ^chewie <chewie@wookimus.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [TCLUG:21751] RH-7.0 installation blunder
Next by Date: Re: [TCLUG] Re: [TCLUG:21751] RH-7.0 installation blunder
Prev by thread: Re: [TCLUG:21791] RH v.s. Debian: A bit of oil on the waters, perhaps?
Next by thread: HUMOR: Emacs ...ahem...sucks ;-)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread