Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3131] Binary portability

To: vanilla-list@us.netrek.org
Subject: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3131] Binary portability
From: Dave Ahn <ahn@vec.wfubmc.edu>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 13:12:53 -0400
In-Reply-To: <200005062114.e46LEtR01323@denali.ccs.neu.edu>; from jeffno@ccs.neu.edu on Sat, May 06, 2000 at 05:14:55PM -0400
Mail-Followup-To: vanilla-list@us.netrek.org
Organization: Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
References: <000e01bfb79c$c4e22780$9d05d2cc@san.rr.com> <200005062114.e46LEtR01323@denali.ccs.neu.edu>

On Sat, May 06, 2000 at 05:14:55PM -0400, Jeffrey Nowakowski wrote:
> "Daniel Damouth" <ddamout1@san.rr.com> wrote:
> >
> > One thing I've notices is that compilers don't always use the same
> > representation for booleans.
> 
> All the code is in C, hence no booleans.

Many C compilers support the boolean type.  Fortunately, we don't use
booleans.

-- 
Dave Ahn <ahn@vec.wfubmc.edu>        |  "When you were born, you cried and the
                                     |  world rejoiced.  Try to live your life
Virtual Endoscopy Center             |  so that when you die, you will rejoice
Wake Forest Univ. School of Medicine |  and the world will cry."  -1/2 jj^2

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3131] Binary portability
  - From: Tom Holub <doosh@best.com>

References:
- Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3131] Binary portability
  - From: "Daniel Damouth" <ddamout1@san.rr.com>
- Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3131] Binary portability
  - From: Jeffrey Nowakowski <jeffno@ccs.neu.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3131] Binary portability
Next by Date: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3131] Binary portability
Prev by thread: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3131] Binary portability
Next by thread: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3131] Binary portability
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread