RE: (ASCEND) SNMP-Traps for Session Up/Down

[Christian Vogel <chris@obelix.bene.baynet.de>]

On Fri, 21 Nov 1997, Ken Packert wrote:

>No the Max does not send a trap with each session. That is a Cisco thing.
>We send a start and stop record via Radius or Tacacs+. Alternately, we
>record each event in an Event MIB. A trap is not the proper mechanism -
>it was not intended to be used in such a high volume environment.

Ok, thanks. I do not want to implement something `outside the specs' :-)

	Christian Vogel

Buergernetz Neumarkt * http://www.bene.baynet.de
Consider yourself disclaimed!

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

References:

• RE: (ASCEND) SNMP-Traps for Session Up/Down
• From: Ken Packert <kpackert@ascend.com>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) linux snmp recommendations?
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap33 woes ....
• Prev by thread: RE: (ASCEND) SNMP-Traps for Session Up/Down
• Next by thread: RE: (ASCEND) SNMP-Traps for Session Up/Down
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread