Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap34

[Stephen Fisher <lithium@cia-g.com>]

Why not put in all the bug fixes and do a week or two (up to a month) of
good testing then release pretty solid code? 

I don't know about others but I always prefer to wait longer to make sure
the bugs are all out even though I have to wait a little while longer for
new features.

 - Steve
  - Systems Manager
  - Community Internet Access, Inc.
  - Gallup and Grants, New Mexico

On Mon, 24 Nov 1997, Jason Nealis wrote:

> 
>  I believe because it takes quite a long time to do a full regression
> test. If they pushed everything through full regression testing then you
> would only see a patch release once a month. The main focus of
> patch releases is to fix bugs.
> 
> Jason Nealis
> Director Internet Operations
> Network Access
> Erols Internet
> 
> 
> On Sun, 23 Nov 1997, Jason Eggleston wrote:
> 
> > Kevin Smith wrote:
> > > 
> > > as we can with a lab environment). Only full releases, like 6.0 will
> > > get a full regression test suite.
> > 
> > Why?
> > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> > To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> > To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> > 
> 
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> 

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

Follow-Ups:

• Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap34
• From: Del <list@cyberback.com>

References:

• Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap34
• From: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ?
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap34
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap34
• Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap34
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread