Re: (ASCEND) SAFirewall - how good is it?

To: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) SAFirewall - how good is it?
From: Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 15:32:39 -0500 (EST)
cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 25 Nov 1997 10:05:18 EST." <Pine.LNX.3.95.971125100306.9529C-100000@babylon.erols.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

>  All my experience comes from playing with the SAM on the pipelines, It
> actually works and works quite good. Except, It seems to be a little
> memory/processor intensive. For instance on the older pipelines I had a

It's also a little bit wintel-intensive on the configuration side.

Sorry, I had to put that in.

-Phil
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) SAFirewall - how good is it?

From: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) wddialout history
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) T1 Hunt Groups
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) SAFirewall - how good is it?
Next by thread: (ASCEND) Pipeline Software Release
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread