Re: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ?

To: Marc Slemko <marcs@znep.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ?
From: "Adam Neat" <adamneat@ipax.com.au>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 1997 00:49:04 +0000
CC: ascend-users@bungi.com
Comments: Authenticated sender is <adamneat@mail01.ipax.com.au>
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSF.3.95.971125232350.14693I-100000@alive.znep.com>
Organization: IPAX Systems
Priority: normal
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.971125092839.20105F-100000@vellocet.insync.net>
Reply-to: adamneat@ipax.com.au
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

> No CPU use that I am aware of, because that would probably reveal just
> how horrid some things are.  Submit it as a feature request as many people
> have been doing for years; don't worry, they aren't ignored you just never
> hear back on them and nothing requested in such a manner is every
> implemented.


Ive been wanting the ability to have fixed if numbers for snmp 
management for ages too!

Other than that, the interface kicks on anything else we've used

eg: ACC/Newbridge!

adam
+-------------------------------------------------+
| Adam Neat                |NOC Tel: 03-9887-1984 |
| National Systems Manager |NOC Fax: 03-9801-8533 |
| IPAX Systems - Australia |http://www.ipax.com.au|
| Mobile: 0414-348-187     |adamneat@ipax.com.au  |
+-------------------------------------------------+
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ?

From: Joe Shaw <jshaw@insync.net>

Re: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ?

From: Marc Slemko <marcs@znep.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Fw: (ASCEND) Pipeline family and Always On/DI?
Next by Date: (ASCEND) Zoom 1.142 Code and AP33?
Next by thread: (ASCEND) What the big ones do
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread