RE: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ? (fwd)

To: MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com>
Subject: RE: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ? (fwd)
From: Joe Shaw <jshaw@insync.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 1997 10:22:30 -0600 (CST)
cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <199711252312.PAA05266@server.livingston.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

On Tue, 25 Nov 1997, MegaZone wrote:

> The RAS line is blurring - PM-3s do BGP(4).  We have people using line0 for
> a PRI and line1 for a T1 with BGP.  Livingston is finally dual homed now
> I believe.  I think we have one IRX and one PM-3 as our routers.  We keep
> swapping things (we guinea pig on ourselves first after all).  The T1 WAN
> card is in field trials, and that will support it too.

BGP on access devices doesn't seem like a good idea to me, but I'm not
everyone.  

> >GRF I hear is pretty damn close though.
> 
> Isn't the GRF's a permutaion of gated?
> 
> -MZ
> --
> Livingston Enterprises - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs

The GRF is a Pentium 166 with 64 megs of ram (stock), and an 85 meg ATA
flash card.  It runs trimmed down BSDI with GateD.

Joe Shaw - jshaw@insync.net
NetAdmin - Insync Internet Services

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

RE: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ? (fwd)

From: MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com>

Prev by Date: RE: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ? (fwd)
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ?
Prev by thread: RE: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ? (fwd)
Next by thread: RE: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ? (fwd)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread