Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ? (fwd)
Once upon a time Dave Van Allen shaped the electrons to say...
>There is not a single case that I can think of where you would want or
>need BGP in a RAS environment. Plus, and unfortunately no ones BGP
The RAS line is blurring - PM-3s do BGP(4). We have people using line0 for
a PRI and line1 for a T1 with BGP. Livingston is finally dual homed now
I believe. I think we have one IRX and one PM-3 as our routers. We keep
swapping things (we guinea pig on ourselves first after all). The T1 WAN
card is in field trials, and that will support it too.
I could see why someone might want to use the other two ports on a 4004
with leased lines.
>implementation except cisco's works well on anything I have tried. The
Which implementations have you tried?
>GRF I hear is pretty damn close though.
Isn't the GRF's a permutaion of gated?
-MZ
--
Livingston Enterprises - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs
Phone: 800-458-9966 510-737-2100 FAX: 510-737-2110 megazone@livingston.com
For support requests: support@livingston.com <http://www.livingston.com/>
Snail mail: 4464 Willow Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups: