Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36
Garbage like this is really irritating. What we have here is a company
who is forging ahead in areas of new technology and communications. They
have consistantly continued to develop and support new and emerging
features. Not only do you want all of the new features yesterday, but you
expect it to work perfectly and then on top of that, you have the gall to
publicly criticize them for a one digit typo in documentation the day that
it comes out. Can you possibly tell me why this is necessary? Or do you
really have nothing better to do?
On Thu, 27 Nov 1997, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote:
>
> The 5.0Ap36 (MAX 400x, 1800, 2000, 200+) has been given to support. This
> release contains the following corrections:
>
> Interesting. The release notes talk about 5.0Ap34. Looks like another
> fine example of Ascends quality control in action.
>
> jaap
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups:
References: