Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36
Because the new features never work until some other company has already
gotten there and done it correctly. Because this is not an uncommon
occurance. Because it is consistent with Ascend since they started to
constantly be _almost_ right but never on target. Forge ahead all you want,
I for one would settle for a 'golden' release like 5.0 was. Its basic common
sense (at least to me) to stop every once in a while and say 'screw new
features' lets go fix all the ones we still haven't made work right. To my
knowledge OSPF _STILL_ doesn't work correctly and thats not exactly a new
feature by anyone's determination. You want to know why we're always
bitching? Its because simple little things like this are exactly whats wrong
with Ascend, a complete and total lack everywhere in the company of QUALITY
CONTROL. _THAT_ sir is why we bitch.
On Thu, Nov 27, 1997 at 12:18:02PM -0600, Stephen Dolloff made some electrons appear in the following form:
> Garbage like this is really irritating. What we have here is a company
> who is forging ahead in areas of new technology and communications. They
> have consistantly continued to develop and support new and emerging
> features. Not only do you want all of the new features yesterday, but you
> expect it to work perfectly and then on top of that, you have the gall to
> publicly criticize them for a one digit typo in documentation the day that
> it comes out. Can you possibly tell me why this is necessary? Or do you
> really have nothing better to do?
>
> On Thu, 27 Nov 1997, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote:
>
> >
> > The 5.0Ap36 (MAX 400x, 1800, 2000, 200+) has been given to support. This
> > release contains the following corrections:
> >
> > Interesting. The release notes talk about 5.0Ap34. Looks like another
> > fine example of Ascends quality control in action.
> >
> > jaap
> > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> > To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> >
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
--
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups:
References: