Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36

[Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>]

 Looks the same? There is a diffence in the nameing at least, As I
detailed in my other message AP33 shows the revision of (A) and
Ap36 shows a revision of (N). So do you guys change naming for nothing
or is it actually a different code ? I'm guesing you guys have
changed at least something.

Jason Nealis
Director Internet Operations
Network Access
Erols Internet


On Thu, 27 Nov 1997, Matt Holdrege wrote:

> At 09:35 AM 11/27/97 -0000, Paul Huish wrote:
> >V1.140N-K56_DLP_CSM of the Rockwell modem 
> >
> >Is this a new version of the Rockwell code or the same as in p33?
> 
> Looks the same to me.
> 
> Matt Holdrege		http://www.ascend.com	matt@ascend.com
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> 


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

Follow-Ups:

• Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36
• From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
• Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36
• From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>

References:

• Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36
• From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>

---

• Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Random reboots of a Max2000
• Next by Date: (ASCEND) How does it work MAXTNT with 8 E1 trunks connected
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36
• Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Max 5.0Ap36
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread