(ASCEND) Re: Pipeline 220

To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com
Subject: (ASCEND) Re: Pipeline 220
From: Kevin Ying <kevin@interq.or.jp>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 1997 10:23:29 +0900 (JST)
In-Reply-To: <199711271856.KAA24618@max.bungi.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

What's the difference between the secure access firewall options for the
P220?  I looked at http://www.uvision.com/ and they indexed the following
options for the P220:

P22-SO-ASA	$728
P22-SWUP-ASA	$1200

What's the difference?  Why the cost differential?  My only thought is
perhaps the SO is an at-purchase option whereas the SWUP is more because
Ascend is penalizing you for not purchasing the option at-purchase and
instead waiting to purchase it later.

Pretty lame, if you ask me...

~~~
Kevin Ying / Chief System Administrator    interQ, Inc.
kevin@ns1.interq.or.jp                     Infoss Tower 10/F        
(vox) +81-3-5456-2555                      20-1 Sakuragaokacho 
(fax) +81-3-5456-2556                      Shibuya-ku, Tokyo 150, JP

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) P75 console port inactive
Next by Date: (ASCEND) Assistance with Filters
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Assistance with Filters
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Re: Pipeline 220
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread