> The RAS line is blurring - PM-3s do BGP(4). We have people using line0 for > a PRI and line1 for a T1 with BGP. Livingston is finally dual homed now > I believe. I think we have one IRX and one PM-3 as our routers. We keep > swapping things (we guinea pig on ourselves first after all). The T1 WAN > card is in field trials, and that will support it too. BGP on access devices doesn't seem like a good idea to me, but I'm not everyone. > >GRF I hear is pretty damn close though. > > Isn't the GRF's a permutaion of gated? > > -MZ > -- > Livingston Enterprises - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs The GRF is a Pentium 166 with 64 megs of ram (stock), and an 85 meg ATA flash card. It runs trimmed down BSDI with GateD. Joe Shaw - jshaw@insync.net NetAdmin - Insync Internet Services ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++ To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com To get FAQ'd: <<A HREF="http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq">http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq</A>> </PRE> <!--X-MsgBody-End--> <!--X-Follow-Ups--> <!--X-Follow-Ups-End--> <!--X-References--> <HR> <STRONG>References</STRONG>: <UL> <LI><STRONG><A HREF="msg10996.html">RE: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ? (fwd)</A></STRONG></LI> <UL> <LI><EM>From</EM>: MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com></LI> </UL> </UL> <!--X-References-End--> <!--X-BotPNI--> <HR> <UL> <LI>Prev by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg11046.html">RE: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ? (fwd)</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by Date: <STRONG><A HREF="msg11045.html">Re: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ?</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Prev by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg11030.html">RE: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ? (fwd)</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Next by thread: <STRONG><A HREF="msg10997.html">RE: (ASCEND) BGP 4 ? (fwd)</A></STRONG> </LI> <LI>Index(es): <UL> <LI><A HREF="maillist.html#11048"><STRONG>Main</STRONG></A></LI> <LI><A HREF="thrd251.html#11048"><STRONG>Thread</STRONG></A></LI> </UL> </LI> </UL> <!--X-BotPNI-End--> <!--X-User-Footer--> <!--X-User-Footer-End--> </BODY> </HTML>