Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) 185's and 11's?
On Mon, 18 May 1998, Jason Nealis wrote:
> My users have been bitching lately about random disconnects so I did
> some digging tonight through my Accounting logs and I found the following
> which almost gave me a heart attack :
>
> I pulled the folloing from a day's worth of accounting on one
> of my accounting servers.
>
> Cause Code 185 (misc: remote end hung up) 45,865
> Cause Code 1 (UNKNOWN) 44,298
> Cause Code 11 (modem: loss of carrier) 26,894
> Cause Code 2 (reason unknown) 1,016
>
> Now either the Ascend is reporting the wrong Ascend-Disconnect
> cause or I'm having some major problems here? I'm curious
> has anyone else seen these MAJOR call-rate failures getting
> logged? I'm especially interested in the 45K and 44K code 185's
> and code 1's.
What percentage of failures do you get?
My stats for a not so busy day:
Abnormal disconnect:
1906 c=11 (DCD became inactive)
386 c=151 (???)
2800 c=185 (Remote hang-up)
------
5092 Todal abnormal disconnects
Normal disconnect:
965 c=100 (Timed out)
160 c=101 (Failed for security reasons)
932 c=42 (Pap failed)
18483 c=45 (Normal disconnect)
578 c=47 (No NCP ie no IP protocol)
------
21118
So over 26210 calls in one day, I got 5092 abnormal disconnects
which make around 20% of failed call for unknown reasons... We run tk.m40
rev. 5.0Ap33 and 36. We get more than 10% of 185 erros, which is not real
good :(
Regards
Cyril Jaouich [CJ837]
---------------------
ACC DATA OPERATIONS EASTERN CANADA/US
-------------------------------------
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups:
References: