On Mon, 18 May 1998, Jason Nealis wrote:For what it's worth...> My users have been bitching lately about random disconnects so I did
> some digging tonight through my Accounting logs and I found the following
> which almost gave me a heart attack :
>
> I pulled the folloing from a day's worth of accounting on one
> of my accounting servers.
>
> Cause Code 185 (misc: remote end hung up) 45,865
> Cause Code 1 (UNKNOWN) 44,298
> Cause Code 11 (modem: loss of carrier) 26,894
> Cause Code 2 (reason unknown) 1,016
>
> Now either the Ascend is reporting the wrong Ascend-Disconnect
> cause or I'm having some major problems here? I'm curious
> has anyone else seen these MAJOR call-rate failures getting
> logged? I'm especially interested in the 45K and 44K code 185's
> and code 1's.What percentage of failures do you get?
My stats for a not so busy day:
Abnormal disconnect:
1906 c=11 (DCD became inactive)
386 c=151 (???)
2800 c=185 (Remote hang-up)
------
5092 Todal abnormal disconnectsNormal disconnect:
965 c=100 (Timed out)
160 c=101 (Failed for security reasons)
932 c=42 (Pap failed)
18483 c=45 (Normal disconnect)
578 c=47 (No NCP ie no IP protocol)
------
21118
Abnormal disconnect:
| Cause Code | Count |
| 1 (UNKNOWN) | 36545 |
| 2 (reason unknown) | 27 |
| 11 (modem: loss of carrier) | 104 |
| 151 (???) | 0 |
| 185 (Remote hang-up) | 7233 |
| total | 43909 |
Normal disconnect
| Cause Code | Count |
| 42 (PAP failed) | 12 |
| 45 (Normal discoonnect) | 26451 |
| 47 (No NCP ie no IP protocol) | 13353 |
| 100 (Timed out) | 28013 |
| 101 (Failed for security resons) | 537 |
| total | 68366 |
These are primarily ISDN calls. Humm, I wonder what c=1 really
means...
BTW - this is a small ISP, and these are monthly figures (no attitude
here ;^)
for the MAX at one of our POPs). But I don't think the period is important
in
this analysis.
Reguards,
Robert