Re: (ASCEND) PRI vs. T1

To: "Kevin Steinhaus" <kevins@hutchtel.net>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) PRI vs. T1
From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1998 14:21:24 -0700
Cc: <ascend-users@bungi.com>
In-Reply-To: <017e01bdd848$65003800$e17009ce@kevins1.hutchtel.net>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 04:10 PM 9/4/98 -0500, Kevin Steinhaus wrote:
>I have been using PRI's to feed our Max 4048's, however we are switching
>over to Channelized T1's.  We are going to be using these boxes only for 56k
>dialup and setting up a Max 6000 for our ISDN customers.
>
>My question is - Is is normal to see a slight drop in connection speeds?
>I've been getting 46-48 very consistantly using the PRI, now I'm getting
>44-46 pretty consistanly using the T1's.  Are there any parameters I need to
>change/tweak on the MAX or is there anything we can do on the Switch side?
>It's a 5ESS running 5E12 software.

The switch has nothing to do with it. But in general, PRI lines have a much
tougher checklist when they are installed by the telco. Sometimes in-band
signaled T1's can have poor SNR or some other malady.

All you can do is ask the telco to check the provisioning of the T1 and
tell them to use the PRI specs.

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

(ASCEND) PRI vs. T1

From: "Kevin Steinhaus" <kevins@hutchtel.net>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) PRI vs. T1 (fwd)
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Lucent -=-> Ascend --> ? (fwd)
Prev by thread: (ASCEND) PRI vs. T1
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) PRI vs. T1
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread