Re: (ASCEND) PRI vs. T1

To: Kevin Steinhaus <kevins@hutchtel.net>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) PRI vs. T1
From: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1998 15:22:24 -0400 (EDT)
cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <017e01bdd848$65003800$e17009ce@kevins1.hutchtel.net>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

> I've been getting 46-48 very consistantly using the PRI, now I'm getting
> 44-46 pretty consistanly using the T1's.  Are there any parameters I need to
> change/tweak on the MAX or is there anything we can do on the Switch side?
> It's a 5ESS running 5E12 software.

FWIW, Here in our environment it has always been that way, Pretty much
everyone get's better connection rates on PRI's in opposed to in-band
signaling. 

Jason Nealis
Director Internet Operations / Network Access
Erols Internet (An RCN Company)



> 
> Thanks
> 
> Kevin Steinhaus
> 
> 
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> 

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

(ASCEND) PRI vs. T1

From: "Kevin Steinhaus" <kevins@hutchtel.net>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Caller ID
Next by Date: (ASCEND) Re: Logon time for individual users
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) PRI vs. T1
Next by thread: (ASCEND) PRI vs. T1 (fwd)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread