Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) 6.1.7 Reboot no Fe.
At 10:06 21/09/98 -0400, Jason Nealis wrote:
>> Anyone else seeing low-memory problems?
>
>It's wierd, the memory changes througout the network, one box is:
>> pools -v
>Validating free lists...
>0 errors; 307 buffers; 615776 bytes memory free
> >
>
>while another box is :
>
>> pools -v
>Validating free lists...
>0 errors; 103 buffers; 1088832 bytes memory free
> >
>
>I wonder if digital calls have something to due again with memory
>loss.
You could be onto something there. There are three main differences between
my two boxes which are behaving very differently:
(1) much higher proportion of digital calls in the leaky/failing one
(2) higher load on the leaky/failing one (partly follows from (1))
(3) both have two PRIs - the OK one has two MacroLinks (aussie-special type
of PRI) but the second has one MacroLink and one OnRamp (aussie-style
Euro-ISDN PRI).
I fail to see what different PRIs could have to do with it (but stranger
things have happened ;-) so that points us back to (1) and (2).
>> Meanwhile, far away on another box, in another city, life is good:
>>
>> -----------------------------8<----------------------------
>> SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Load: febik.m40 Revision: 6.1.7
>> Date: 08/20/1998. Time: 09:20:08
>>
>> > pools -v
>> Validating free lists...
>> 0 errors; 233 buffers; 802912 bytes memory free
>> >
>>
>> Syd%show uptime
>> system uptime: up 32 days, 13 hours, 28 minutes, 29 seconds
>> Syd%
>> -----------------------------8<----------------------------
No, it's not in Utopia! ;-)
Regards,
Neale.
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>