Real Time Ascend Maling List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) How Ascend should fix thier software problem
5.0Apxx doesn't support V.90 or K56FLEX. We need both (we are an ISP).
Marc
>
> --IMA.Boundary.4972750290
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Description: cc:Mail note part
>
>
>
> While I agree with the sentiment (it took eighteen months
> to get a stable code version for the 4004)...
> we have been relatively stable with 5.0Ap42 and 5.0Ap36.
> Some of these have been up constantly for
> several months. And this includes a couple of sites with a
> high level of use. We use V.34 modems.
>
> On the other hand the thought of upgrading to 7.x.x is
> scarey given the track record.
>
>
>
> From: Marc Newman <mknewman@blkbox.com> AT Internet on
> 03/04/99 07:59 AM
>
>
> To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com AT
> Internet@sym-corp@ccMTA-SYM-CORP
> cc: kevin.smith@ascend.com AT
> Internet@sym-corp@ccMTA-SYM-CORP (bcc: Michael
> Medwid/Cupertino/Cal/SYMANTEC)
> Subject: (ASCEND) How Ascend should fix thier software
> problem
>
>
> --IMA.Boundary.4972750290
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Description: cc:Mail note part
>
>
> There is only one answer possible:
>
> Ascend should open thier source tree to the public domain.
>
> They have been ineffective in implementing changes (almost
> everything is broken when they first release it) and it
> takes several releases to fix anything. I still, after 4
> years, 3 revs of modem cards (28800, 33600 and 56kb) and
> untold versions of software don't have a stable release of
> software for my Max4004's. I have been fighting with them
> on this since 4.3.
>
> I want a release that will not slow down under after a few
> days, will not reboot on it's own, and will support all the
> announced features.
>
> I do have a Pipeline 400T with 8 modems that has been up
> for 2 years.
>
> Marc
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to
> ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> --IMA.Boundary.4972750290
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name="RFC822 message headers"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Description: cc:Mail note part
> Content-Disposition: inline; filename="RFC822 message headers"
>
>
> Received: from mailer.Symantec.Com ([198.6.49.176]) by
> smtp-ima.symantec.com
> with SMTP
> (IMA Internet Exchange 3.1) id 0053379E; Thu, 4 Mar 1999
> 07:10:28 -0800
> Received: from max.bungi.com (max.bungi.com [207.126.97.7])
> by mailer.Symantec.Com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id
> HAA16893
> for <mmedwid@symantec.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 07:10:17 -0800
> (PST)
> Received: (from majordom@localhost)
> by max.bungi.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id FAA09301
> for ascend-users-outgoing; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 05:59:41 -0800
> (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: max.bungi.com: majordom set
> sender to
> owner-ascend-users using -f
> Received: from blkbox.com (mknewman@blkbox.com
> [206.109.97.2])
> by max.bungi.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA09296
> for <ascend-users@max.bungi.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 05:59:36
> -0800 (PST)
> Received: (from mknewman@localhost)
> by blkbox.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA25080;
> Thu, 4 Mar 1999 07:59:33 -0600 (CST)
> From: Marc Newman <mknewman@blkbox.com>
> Message-Id: <199903041359.HAA25080@blkbox.com>
> Subject: (ASCEND) How Ascend should fix thier software
> problem
> To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com
> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 07:59:33 -0600 (CST)
> Cc: kevin.smith@ascend.com
> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 PGP3 *ALPHA*]
> Content-Type: text
> Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com
> Precedence: bulk
>
>
> --IMA.Boundary.4972750290--
>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>