(ASCEND) Which version is best for 56k?

["Huelbe Arizon Garcia" <huelbe@zaz.com.br>]

Hello!

Here we have a Max 4000 running TAOS 7.2.0. My customers are complaining
that if one connects to this Max, connections are established at 42.000 to
46.666 bps. But, if one connects to
other NAS in other city (which has Cisco and TNT NASes), the speed is always
better, up to 54.333 bps.

For your information, these customers generally have HSP or Winmodems, like
Lucent LT V.90.

So, I would like to know if I upgrade this Max to TAOS 7.4.0 or 8.0.x will
cause to V.90 connection get better rates. And, is 8.0.x stable or are there
any reports of problems?

Greetings,

Huelbe.

P.S.: I apologize for my poor english...

----- Original Message -----
From: Phil Bedard <philb@cyberlynk.net>
To: <ascend-users@bungi.com>
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 1:17 PM
Subject: (ASCEND) 7.0.26 must use assigned address somewhere?


      Does anyone know if somewhere in 7.0.x they have introduced a
command to make it so the remote end must accept the assigned address?
I upgraded a max4k to 7.0.26 from 6.0.8 and now a couple of users are
getting their old IP addresses, which they have configured in their
equipment.  They were getting the correct radius assigned ips until I
upgraded to 7.0.26.

Phil Bedard
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>