Re: (ASCEND) Which version is best for 56k?

[John Coy <jcoy@anc.net>]

I'm interested in knowing how you're running anything
greater than 7.0.26 on a MAX 40XX box?  Ascend stopped
supporting the MAX 40XX platform in TAOS version 7.0.X.

Are you sure you're not running 7.0.2X?

John

At 04:01 PM 2/28/00 -0300, Huelbe Arizon Garcia wrote:
>Hello!
>
>Here we have a Max 4000 running TAOS 7.2.0. My customers are complaining
>that if one connects to this Max, connections are established at 42.000 to
>46.666 bps. But, if one connects to
>other NAS in other city (which has Cisco and TNT NASes), the speed is always
>better, up to 54.333 bps.
>
>For your information, these customers generally have HSP or Winmodems, like
>Lucent LT V.90.
>
>So, I would like to know if I upgrade this Max to TAOS 7.4.0 or 8.0.x will
>cause to V.90 connection get better rates. And, is 8.0.x stable or are there
>any reports of problems?
>
>Greetings,
>
>Huelbe.
>
>P.S.: I apologize for my poor english...
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Phil Bedard <philb@cyberlynk.net>
>To: <ascend-users@bungi.com>
>Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 1:17 PM
>Subject: (ASCEND) 7.0.26 must use assigned address somewhere?
>
>
>       Does anyone know if somewhere in 7.0.x they have introduced a
>command to make it so the remote end must accept the assigned address?
>I upgraded a max4k to 7.0.26 from 6.0.8 and now a couple of users are
>getting their old IP addresses, which they have configured in their
>equipment.  They were getting the correct radius assigned ips until I
>upgraded to 7.0.26.
>
>Phil Bedard
>++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
>To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
>To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
>++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
>To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
>To get FAQ'd:   <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>