Re: [TCLUG:8010] IMAP vs POP3

[Ben Kochie <ben@nerp.net>]

From what I have seen, it was simple program overflow checking with the UW
imap daemon, not the protocol itself.

Thank You,
        Ben Kochie (ben@nerp.net)

*-----------------------*  [ - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - ]
| Unix/Linux Consulting |  [ Haiku Error Message:          ]
|  PC/Mac Repair        |  [  Chaos reigns within.         ]
|   Networking          |  [  Reflect, repent, and reboot. ]
| http://nerp.net       |  [  Order shall return.          ]
*-----------------------*  [ - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - ]

 "Unix is user friendly, Its just picky about its friends."

On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Bob Tanner wrote:

> IMAP vs POP3
> 
> I have read the POP3 vs IMAP at http://www.imap.org/imap.vs.pop.brief.html but
> they do not address security. I have seen lots of stuff on BUGTRAQ on IMAP
> holes, so I am asking the community for feedback on running IMAP.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> Bob Tanner <tanner@real-time.com>       | Phone : (612)943-8700
> http://www.real-time.com                | Fax   : (612)943-8500
> Key fingerprint =  6C E9 51 4F D5 3E 4C 66 62 A9 10 E5 35 85 39 D9 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe@mn-linux.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help@mn-linux.org
>