TCLUG Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [TCLUG:11279] Hit The Routes!!!
Heres a diagram...
eth1 (205.218.57.18) --
-- Our Server Block
/
internet -- eth0 (205.218.57.25) -- FIREWALLMACHINE
\
eth2 (192.168.6.2) --
-- Our Workstation
Block
----------
>From: schewe@tcfreenet.org
>To: tclug-list@mn-linux.org
>Subject: Re: [TCLUG:11279] Hit The Routes!!!
>Date: Sat, Dec 18, 1999, 4:10 PM
>
> On 18 Dec, Brian Ackermann wrote:
>> I've subsequently removed all static routes.... heres my current routing
table.
>> Kernel IP routing table
>> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
>> 205.218.57.25 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0
>> 205.218.57.18 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth1
>> 192.168.6.2 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth2
>> 205.218.57.16 * 255.255.255.240 U 0 0 0 eth1
>> 192.168.6.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth2
>> 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
>> default gw.bbros.com 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
>>
>>
> So you get to 205.218.57.25 by eth0, but to the rest of 205.218.57.x
> via eth1?
>
>> So, everything appears to be how I want it...machines on each subnet can talk
to
>> their own, andthe firewall machine. Now, I need to get machines behind the
>> firewall to talk to the rest of the internet....,
>
> That should be just a matter of enabling forwarding and putting some
> holes in the firewall for IP masquarding.
> --
> Jon Schewe
> http://eggplant.mtu.net/~jpschewe
> schewe@tcfreenet.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe@mn-linux.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help@mn-linux.org
>
>