Re: [TCLUG:6543] onvoy.net

To: tclug-list@listserv.real-time.com
Subject: Re: [TCLUG:6543] onvoy.net
From: Bob Tanner <tanner@real-time.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 12:51:15 -0500
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9906170741070.17737-100000@hero.math.umn.edu>; from Peter Lukas on Thu, Jun 17, 1999 at 07:41:26AM -0500
Mail-Followup-To: tclug-list@listserv.real-time.com
References: <19990617004935.B13695@wizard.real-time.com> <Pine.LNX.4.10.9906170741070.17737-100000@hero.math.umn.edu>

Quoting Peter Lukas (peter@math.umn.edu):
> Unfortunately, no...  It gets greedy near the top.
> 

That sucks. It gives Onvoy a major advantage. Real Time looses more DSL
clients because USWest cannot deploy DSL fast enough.

So, people go to cable modems or stay with AOL.

-- 
Bob Tanner <tanner@real-time.com>       | Phone : (612)943-8700
http://www.real-time.com                | Fax   : (612)943-8500
Key fingerprint =  6C E9 51 4F D5 3E 4C 66 62 A9 10 E5 35 85 39 D9

References:
- Re: [TCLUG:6543] onvoy.net
  - From: Bob Tanner <tanner@real-time.com>
- Re: [TCLUG:6543] onvoy.net
  - From: Peter Lukas <peter@math.umn.edu>
- Re: [TCLUG:6543] onvoy.net
  - From: Peter Lukas <peter@math.umn.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: [TCLUG:6543] onvoy.net
Next by Date: Qmail alias duplicates
Prev by thread: Re: [TCLUG:6543] onvoy.net
Next by thread: Re: [TCLUG:6543] onvoy.net
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread